Comment

Comment on Social media algorithms ‘amplifying misogynistic content’

postnataldrip@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

It’s well-known that these algorithms push topics to drive engagement, and naturally things that make people angry or frightened or disgusted etc enough are more likely to be engaged with regardless of what that topic is.

source

Sort:hotnew top

kat_angstrom@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
When outrage is the prime driver of engagement it’s going to push some people right off the platform entirely, and the ones who stay are psychologically worse off for it.

source
- Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Social media execs, “we’ve done the math and it’s worth it”
  
  source
  - kat_angstrom@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Worth it for them, for short term profits. Good thing nobody is considering the net effect this has on society or political discourse.
    
    source
JoBo@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
They could certainly do with a control group or three. The point they’re trying to make is that over 5 days of watching recommended videos the proportion that were mysogynistic grew from 13% on day 1 to 52% on day 5. That suggests a disproportionate algorithmic boost but it’s hard to tell how much that was caused by the videos they chose to view.

A real world trial ought to be possible. You could recruit thousands of kids to just do their own thing and report back. It’s a very hard question to study in the lab because it’s nothing like the real world.

source