I think you want to use hourly cost, or maybe some other measure of the utility of something. I can own a rock, and it may be a magnificent rock that will last centuries, but it isn’t going to give me much benefit.
Same with an old cell phone. I may be able to use it for 8 years, but I’m not going to use it for navigation, taking pictures, video chatting with family/friends, replacing my laptop when I’m out, etc.
Your table is a good start, but it’s missing some really important information
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Please what info is it missing? I added the iPods for that reason.
kent_eh@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
The entire android ecosystem
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Very good pint.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Maybe add a popular budget android phone too as opposed to flag ships.
machinin@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Basically, I don’t think think monthly cost of ownership is a good metric for value.
I probably used an old cell phone maybe 3 hours a week. I use my smartphone at least 3 hours a day communicating with people, reading news, studying, games for kids, work, etc. I don’t think monthly cost of ownership reflects the value that those devices bring me. Your table needs a different column that measures the value more appropriately. Perhaps ownership cost per hour of usage?
You have another issue in that smartphones replace cameras, radios/Walkmen, maps, and even laptops I’m many cases. An iphone doesn’t just replace an old Nokia, it replaces all those other items as well.
I don’t think you need more rows, you need different columns.