Comment on No pets
TrendigOsthyvel@lemmy.world 9 months agoCool, looks like a lot of video to watch, I’ll take your word for it. Not too surprising thinking about it.
Comment on No pets
TrendigOsthyvel@lemmy.world 9 months agoCool, looks like a lot of video to watch, I’ll take your word for it. Not too surprising thinking about it.
hOrni@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Maybe not surprising, but still disappointing. I liked IH videos, but knowing that a lot of it is stolen, puts a stain on it. But at least it explains why his videos tend to disappear from his channel.
GoodEye8@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Was he the guy who also kept making all sorts of Nazi references?
Interstellar_1@pawb.social 9 months ago
Yeah there’s an alarming amount of them.
TrendigOsthyvel@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Today’s MVP!! And I agree, it puts a smear over all the content.
bort@feddit.de 9 months ago
I am not saying this is a big nothing burger, but his only real mistakes was not to list his sources.
d2k1@feddit.de 9 months ago
Yeah, no. He almost entirely verbatim copied the text and wording on the original article and shuffled some words around to try and make it less obvious (and failed). It is blatant plagiarism, there is no other way to call it. This was no innocent mistake of forgetting to list a source. Watch the hbomberguy video segment about it, it paints a very clear picture.
bort@feddit.de 9 months ago
yes, and a solution could have been to cite sources.
I don’t think, that not-citing-sources is an innocent mistake.
I did. I does paint a very colorful picture. Full of opinion and sarcasm and rhethoric.
Here is a rule-of-thumb to decide if an argument was convincing because it had good content, or because it was well written: If the content was good, it will be easy for you explain to a 3rd party. If only the presentation was good, then you will have a hard time convincing others.