Comment

Comment on Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature

How has no one worked on a new search engine over the last decade or so where Google has been on a clear decline in its flagship product!

I know of the likes of DDG, and Bing has worked hard to catch up, but I’m genuinely surprised that a startup hasn’t risen to find a novel way of attacking reliable web search. Some will say it’s a “solved problem”, but I’d argue that it was, but no longer.

A web search engine that crawls and searches historic versions of a web page could be an incredibly useful resource. If someone can also find a novel way to rank and crawl web applications or to find ways to “open” the closed web, it could pair with web search to be a genuine Google killer.

source

Sort:hotnew top

mlg@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Google invents, invests, or previously invested into some ground breaking technology

They buy out competition and throw tons of effort into making superior product

Eventually Google becomes defacto standard

Like a few years pass

Google hands off project to fresh interns to reduce the crap out of the cloud usage to decrease cost

Any viable alternatives are immediately bought out by Google

Anything left over is either struggling FOSS or another crappy corporate attempt (cough cough Microsoft)

Repeat

My favorite case in point being Google Maps.
source
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
There’s a lot of startups trying to make better search engines. Brave for example is one of them. There’s even one Lemmy user, but I forget what the name of theirs is.

But it’s borderline impossible. In the old days, Google used webscrapers and key word search. When people started uploading the whole dictionary in white text on their pages, Google added some antispam and context logic. When that got beat, they handled web credibility by the number of “inlinks” from other websites. Then SEO came out to beat link farmers, and you know the rest from there.

An indexable version of Archive.org is feasible, borderline trivial with ElasticSearch, but the problem is who wants that? Sure you want I may, but no one else cares. Also, let’s say you want to search up something specific - each page could be indexed, with slight differences, thousands of times. Which one will you pick? Maybe you’ll want to set your “search date” to a specific year? Well guess what, Google has that feature as well.

source
- TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Brave is not a business that should be supported. Also, I’m pretty sure they just use Bing for a back end.
  
  There are also a few paid search engines that people say are good.
  
  source
  - Veddit@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    What’s the issues with brave??
    
    source
    TWeaK@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    They’ve had a history of controversy over their life, ranging from replacing ads with their own affiliate links to bundling an opt-out crypto miner. Every time something like this happened, the CEO went on a marketing campaign across social media, effectively drowning out the controversial story with an influx of new users. The CEO meanwhile has got in trouble for his comments on same-sex marriage and covid-19.
    
    In general, it’s always seemed like it would take a very small sack of money for Brave to sell out its users. Also, their browser is Chromium based, so it’s still contributing to Google’s market dominance and dictatorial position over web technologies.
    
    source
- Pulptastic@midwest.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Cached versions can sometimes get around a paywall when a site gives Google access but charges users.
  
  source
  - OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Archive.is them
    
    source
piecat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The next revolutionary search engine will be an AI that understands you. Like what a librarian is… Not just ads served.

source
- spujb@lemmy.cafe ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  i don’t need a search engine that understand me i need a search engine that finds sites and pages based on a string of text i provide it
  
  we should be calling the future piss the way it’s going down the toilet
  
  source
  - piecat@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Well, at the least, you need something to filter out the shit trying to game seo. To me it seems that AI is the easiest approach.
    
    source
gunslingerfry@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I recommend Kagi. Bought a family plan and it feels like I’ve gone back to 2016 when the search engines weren’t a dumpster fire.

source
- UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Second kagi. I’m just on the personal plan, but can confirm it’s fire
  
  source
sgtgig@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Bing’s copilot is genuinely pretty good, the AI answer is often pretty accurate and the way it’s able to weave links into its answer is handy. I find it way more useful than Google search these days and I’m pretty much just using it on principle as Google is just pissing me off with killing their services, a few of which I’ve used.

I don’t think Microsoft is some saint but copilot is just a good product.

source
AAA@feddit.de ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Yes, that would be a Google killer. If you somehow find the money to provide it for free.

Finding a novel way of searching is one thing. Finding a novel way of financing the whole endeavor (and not going the exact route Google is) is another.

source