Comment

Comment on What Meta’s Fediverse Plans Mean for Threads Users

originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Ha.. no.

As I said before, their instance and it's bells and whistles are irrelevant to my instance. Me and my instance only care about The ap protocol. I have no reason to fear their instance as long as it's pumping out the standard protocol. Anything not standard gets dropped.

Zero problem here.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Oh, be assured that threads will one day defederate and build a wall so you can’t access their content anymore. The Fediverse need to have a critical mass of users to survive when it happens, but if the features thread offers are too compelling and the majority of the new accounts are made in threads, the Fediverse is screwed.

source
- FaceDeer@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  Oh, be assured that threads will one day defederate and build a wall so you can’t access their content anymore.
  
  Isn't that already the case? The Fediverse is doing fine under current circumstances.
  
  source
- originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  so youve confirmed that i have nothing to fear from this. thank you
  
  i will be calling this the 'feature envy' argument henceforth
  
  source
sour@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
for profit company that enabled genocide is problem

source
- originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  ahh i see the 'non-technical, moral' argument. i can appreciate this one. take a stand, you do you!
  
  im going to do me.
  
  i dont go out of my way to block instances just because i hate the companies. im focusing on interoperability concerns.
  
  im glad we can agree, theres no technical concern with threads federation.
  
  source
  - sour@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    do you federate with poast
    
    source