Comment

Comment on Bind 9.18.18 dnssec key location and privileges?

TheInsane42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

You need to include the files in the zone file. Bind 9.18.18 is a mess with the changed DNSSEC setup, it broke my domains as well. I’t isn the bind documentation, so I have to refer you there. I have no access to my setup now (or my browser history) as I’m not at my computer.

source

Sort:hotnew top

tburkhol@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
I’d tried that…this has been going on for five days, and I can not describe my level of frustration. But I solved it, literally just now.

Despite systemctl status apparmor.service claiming it was inactive, it was secretly active. audit.log was so full of sudo that I failed to see all of the

apparmor=“DENIED” operation=“mknod” profile=“/usr/sbin/named” name=“/etc/bind/dnssec-keys/K[zone].+013+16035.l6WOJd” pid=152161 comm=“isc-net-0002” requested_mask=“c” denied_mask=“c” fsuid=124 ouid=124FSUID=“bind” OUID=“bind”

That made me realize, when I thought I fixed the apparmor rule, I’d used /etc/bind/dnskey/ rw instead of /etc/bind/dnskey/** rw

The bind manual claims that you don’t need to manually create keys or manually include them in your zone file, if you use dnssec-policy default or presumably any other policy with inline-signing. Claims that bind will generate its own keys, write them, and even manage timed rotation or migration to a new policy. I can’t confirm or deny that, because it definitely found the keys I had manually created (one of which was $INCLUDEd in the zone file, and one not) and used them. It also edited them and created .state files.

I feel like I should take the rest of the day off and celebrate.

source
- TheInsane42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Sorry, totally forgot apparmor. On debian that thing can be nasty, I had to fix those rules as well for bind That was years ago and was added to my Puppet module, so I forgot.
  
  source