An unelected person or persons, being given control over government is not democratic.
The government if it has to exist, needs only to be accountable to the citizens it exists to serves.
An unelected person or persons, being given control over government is not democratic.
The government if it has to exist, needs only to be accountable to the citizens it exists to serves.
Nath@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Well, if it’s baked into our constitution, the implementation of such a role is created by a democratic process. So, while the individual may not be directly elected, we (or our ancestors in our case) did vote the position into existence. I wouldn’t be against this person being elected directly under some future constitution, though I have concerns how they could maintain their distance from our politics if that were the case. That is a question I’d want adressed.
Conversely, a government without such a role leads to what our friends in the USA have. A system that gets bogged down in stupid politics so badly that they literally shut down their whole government every few years over their political in-fighting. They don’t have anyone to force them to behave. I wouldn’t want that.