Comment on What is going on with Kbin
Kata1yst@kbin.social 8 months agoWhy do you assume that? Why is your way of open source the right way?
All open source projects are run by a small team of people reviewing and accepting, rejecting, and prioritizing work. What part of this project's methodology bothers you?
TheVillageGuy@kbin.melroy.org 8 months ago
Please prove me wrong, but I am interpreting this as a confirmation of my feeling that development is currently ongoing in the background.
Open source and maintained in an obscure location do not go well together in one sentence. Perhaps if it had been like this all along from the start, so people knew what they were getting into. Taking OSS development offline whenever it suits one person, without any form of announcement let alone an explanation to the community, would bother me
Kata1yst@kbin.social 8 months ago
What obscure location? Codeberg?
All the activity is open on Codeberg. You can see every member of that team actively merging and reviewing requests.
TheVillageGuy@kbin.melroy.org 8 months ago
My point is that there has been no commit to Codeberg. So, if development is still ongoing, it is being done somewhere else.
Kata1yst@kbin.social 8 months ago
Development is happening in the dev's branches. Branches are generally kept local until submitted for a PR. You can easily see this in the origin branches and open PRs.
Honestly I'm not sure if you're trolling, don't understand git development, or if you really think that a project needs to iterate main multiple times per month to be your definition of "healthy open source", but I'm tired of shooting down such lazy attacks and won't be responding further.
Have a nice day.