It wasn’t a DMCA. They advised the dude to take it down due to Nintendo bring Nintendo.
You have no clue. It was Valve who issued the DMCA takedown. Yes, based on the wrong argument that APIs are copyrighted by Nintendo but Valve cannot take down random software. They are only involved because it uses Portal assets.
LinyosT@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It wasn’t a DMCA. They advised the dude to take it down due to Nintendo bring Nintendo.
This information is really easy to look up.
People here are constantly claiming that Nintendo demanded from Valve to take action in order to not get sued. I suggest you complain to the paid authors of PC Gamer because they are the ones writing about Valve lawyers: “there’s at least a possibility Valve could end up sucked into a dispute over it. Even if it’s only tangential involvement, Valve’s lawyers may have just decided that it’s not worth the headache.”
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
I think you need to read the comment you replied to again.
Here’s the bullet points:
Valve doesn’t want Nintendo getting involved
Valve think Nintendo will get involved because the project is using confidential Nintendo code
Valve think Nintendo may litigate (or are already) against them because Portal is Valve’s IP
Valve want it down so Nintendo can’t mistake it to be Valve’s responsibility and so Valve don’t get the blame
woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Valve is only involved because the game uses Valve’s assets. It’s not so hard to understand. Nintendo didn’t even issue the takedown. Valve did.
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Neither I or the person you replied to have said Nintendo have issued this takedown. That is not what we said
woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Exactly. Valve did because the port uses Valve assets. That’s what I said.