Comment

Comment on Instances in the free fediverses should consider "transitive defederation" from instances that federate with Meta

Excrubulent@slrpnk.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

What matters is what can be done with the protocol. If it goes off the rails we can just fork it. Defederation is baked in at this point.

And I can see you don’t have anything to back up your claim that federation is somehow an unimportant side feature of federation.

Sort:hotnew top

orgrinrt@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Man, you had a good point initially, but now you’re just really stubbornly defending a position you must realize is a really thin one. You’re arguing that they implied defederation isn’t important, but that’s a straw man you yourself constructed, not what they said at all.

I think you might have lost sight of what’s rational for pride or something.

source
- Excrubulent@slrpnk.net ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  you’re just really stubbornly defending a position you must realize is a really thin one. […] that’s a straw man you yourself constructed […] I think you might have lost sight of what’s rational for pride or something.
  
  All of this is pure projection. You don’t need to invent an elaborate fantasy about what a bad thinky person I am in order to make a point, if you have one.
  
  You’re arguing that they implied defederation isn’t important, but that’s a straw man you yourself constructed, not what they said at all.
  
  And this fucking bullshit is just gaslighting. The thread is still here, at least for now. I can read it.
  
  source