Security? No. Privacy? Of course (assuming you don’t use vanilla FF). Is it much easier to escape the sandbox in Gecko than Chromium. Doesn’t matter what options they give you in the settings titled “Security”.
LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
Yeah, I’ll never use Chrome again. Google has always been shady, but this latest round of anti-features is unbelievable. I’m shocked there’s been no anti-trust suits related to what they’re doing with Chrome. Firefox is just a better browser with way more security options and extension support. That alone is enough for me to stick with it.
driveway@lemmy.zip 8 months ago
sir_reginald@lemmy.world 8 months ago
you can always enable Project Fission for a better sandbox in Firefox.
unreasonabro@lemmy.world 8 months ago
lmao at the thought of mozilla suing microsoft. Basically no resources vs functionally infinite resources, they would stand no chance at all. I don’t know if you’ve noticed but our legal system is based on a variation of might vs right, we could call it rich vs bitch for convenience
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
Regulators are blind to this, it’s too technical.
bigbadmoose@lemmy.world 8 months ago
And they are too rich and too old to know or care
LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Me, a foss contributer choosing edge because it’s a more convenient browser 🤷♂️
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 8 months ago
More power to you! Edge isn’t bad, it just has bad affiliations.