It probably doesn’t help that, up until days ago, the biggest articles written about this were by a guy with a history of wanting Mozilla – and a handful of other companies – to fail, not because of bad behavior but because of a personal/political vendetta. (For comparison, he’s put out content supportive of Twitter despite its CEO.)
I guess it’s easy to say that any critic is one of his sycophants, but I’ve heard the criticism growing louder even within Mozilla’s own communities.
TigrisMorte@kbin.social 10 months ago
Which is all also irrelevant to the browser behavior.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Actually no, thanks to Mozilla becoming a shittier company, it’s making Firefox worse in the process. For example, since Firefox 119, it’s been shipping with a data-sucking sidebar that it never announced in its release notes.
TigrisMorte@kbin.social 10 months ago
Your bookmarks are sucking data? Care to back that up with any evidence whatsoever?
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Huh. I wonder why you didn’t respond to my comment with evidence. Silly of me to think you weren’t a concern troll
kbin.social/m/technology@lemmy.world/t/…/4471231
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Who said anything about bookmarks? I said sidebar.
Review Checker, powered by the FakeSpot subsidiary
…mozilla.org/…/review-checker-review-quality
To learn more about it, look at their release notes… Except it’s not in their release notes.
www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/…/releasenotes/
It’s hard to believe they missed something that is a headliner outside of the stuff they showed their users, isn’t it?
And finally, check out the data Mozilla can sell to third parties. They should know, after all, they purchased it!
www.fakespot.com/privacy-policy