Comment

Comment on Study shows AI image-generators being trained on explicit photos of children

No, it didn’t but it seems like mine went over yours. Furries usually are fine outside a few bad actors but pedophiles are mentally ill and should not be allowed them to generate AI CSAM just to satisfy them. They should be seeking help, not jerking it to fake kiddies.

source

Sort:hotnew top

onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Why is wanting to commit bestiality not worse than wanting to have sex with minors?

source
- Nommer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  And there it is. Your problem is you equate furries to pedophiles because you think furries are into bestiality. Thanks for proving you’re an idiot.
  
  source
  - onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    kekw
    
    anthropomorphize animals: dress up as animals, act like animals, romp like animals - “IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANIMALS OK!?!?!?!”
    
    mhm, ok. sure. And because it’s animals, it’s fine, because kids aren’t animals.
    
    whatever you tell yourself, honey.
    
    source
    Nommer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Every single one of you retards devolve to the same argument. Get better material.
    
    source
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
People used to say trans people were mentally ill. If they’re not harming actual children, what’s it to you what their fetish is?

source
- Nommer@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Stop trying to justify your mental illness. You need to seek help if you think fucking kids is okay.
  
  source
  - JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I don’t think that. Obviously actually having sex with children is wrong. I was saying that generating AI child porn with no actual harm to children involved can’t be logically argued to be immoral.
    
    source