Comment on Reuters has taken down -- globally -- an important hacking-for-profit investigation that included details about an Indian hacking entrepreneur -- because he got a court in that country to say so.

<- View Parent
Vash63@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

What’s the difference between the court saying it’s defamation, and thus illegal to publish and worthy of awarding damages, and ordering it taken down? Seems like splitting hairs.

source
Sort:hotnewtop