Comment on Intel's comeback appears on track — CEO Gelsinger says 18A process node performance is 'a little bit ahead' of TSMC's N2, but Intel's process arrives a year earlier than TSMC's

• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I do not count Arc as a failure, allegedly the cards are pretty good with the new drivers. It was previous attempts of making cards that ran pure raytracing, that were supposed to compete with Nvidia in datacenters. But to be fair, 5 years of fumbling is some years ago, I was talking more 5 to 10 years back, where it appeared Intel failed with just about everything.

  But Itanium their new server 64 bit CPU is way longer ago, and so is the GPU I think it was Knights Ferry, complete failure with twice the energy consumption and half the performance of Nvidia. Only later production began to fail too, and Intel Core2 was shortly beat by Ryzen on all parameters, and of course Optane failed too.

  source

  • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Itanium

    Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time.

    And the Xeon Phi (Knight’s Ferry/Landing) was in the GPU space, but only in GPGPU. The idea was that the Xeon Phi, with an x86-compatible core, could, with less modification, run software that was originally targeted to a standard x86 CPU. Something like 68-70 x86-64 cores.

    I had a couple of them when I was taking parallel programming back in the day. Nifty little devices, but largely outshined by distributed multiprocessing for x86-64 and paled in comparison to the power of CUDA. That might be my own bias talking though.

    source

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      paled in comparison to the power of CUDA. That might be my own bias talking though.

      I don’t have personal experience, but AFAIK that’s what everybody says.

      source
  • vikingtons@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Oh right, my mistake. I do vaguely recall their prior endeavour

    source