Comment

Comment on Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, claims Human Rights Watch.

JustSomePerson@kbin.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I am not claiming that there's no censorship in the fediverse. I'm claiming that there is censorship, meaning that the fact that Meta also uses censorship is no argument against them. You censor people you call nazis, they censor people who think three generations of occupation in Palestine is a bad thing. Both have problems. This piece of news about Meta censorship is not an argument against federation.

source

Sort:hotnew top

sour@kbin.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

both sides

source
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
This piece of news is more proof (as if we didn’t already have enough) that Meta specifically is an entity that cannot be trusted to act in good faith, and therefore integrating with them is a risk we should not take. If you’d like to take it a step further, instances that are already generally accepted as harmful due to their content or who operates them are already defederated with most/all other major instances, for good reason. This is no different.

You were the one who tried to narrow the goalposts to make the argument specifically only about censorship. All of Meta’s bad behavior is valid cause for concern. Institutionalized politically motivated censorship is just one aspect of it. What we do and don’t allow on our own particular instances has no bearing on it. Trying to bleat “both sides bad” is not a valid argument in this case.

source
- JustSomePerson@kbin.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  trusted to act in good faith
  
  You are not acting in good faith when you are arguing that your members should be blocked from communicating with anybody on Meta servers, because of guilt by association. What you don't allow on your particular instances has great bearing, because it shows that you are no different from them, other than in which opinions you consider to be worthy of suppressing.
  
  source
  - dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Meta: Mass suppression of users and political topics, overt attempts at manipulation of public opinion via bots and paid shills, deliberate construction of their algorithms to display specific content targeted at users designed to sway their opinion or get them to buy something, ads, massive violations of privacy, spying, tracking, mishandling of user data, tacit approval of hate speech and fascist rhetoric, and flagrant violation of both domestic and foreign laws.
    
    Me: Hey, we can see what they’re doing over there and we really shouldn’t let them bring it over here.
    
    You: “YoU’rE BoTh ThE SaMe!!!”
    
    Do you actually believe the horseshit you’re spouting, or are you just that out of touch with reality?
    
    source
    JustSomePerson@kbin.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Grow up. It is not possible for you to hide from the real world. The suppression of opinion in the fediverse is real. You admit so yourself two comments above. You call them nazis and evil, which is childish and unproductive. Have you considered communicating with those with different opinions instead of attempting to ban them from participation in society?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments