Comment on Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content
chitak166@lemmy.world 10 months agoI totally agree.
If I don’t want to see something, I should be able to block it myself.
I don’t want other people deciding what I should and should not see. That’s patronizing.
affiliate@lemmy.world 10 months ago
if the nazis come into power, you will not be able to “decide not to see them”
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I don’t think preemptive fascism is the solution. The world many people seem to be advocating for here doesn’t honestly seem that much different from one led by nazies. They just replace jews and gays with other groups of people they don’t like.
affiliate@lemmy.world 10 months ago
you’re conflating fascism with the actions necessary to stop fascism. you may want to read up on the “paradox of tolerance”. here’s the first sentence from the wikipedia page:
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 10 months ago
That logic is in conflict with itself. It’s literally advocating for intolerance to get rid of intolerance.
People are against nazies but meanwhile advocate we treat other groups they dont like the way nazies would treat jews. Be that millionaires/billionaires, capitalists, republicans or whatever. “Eat the rich”
I can’t get behind that. Daylight is the best disinfectant. I want nazies to be allowed to announce publicly that they’re nazies.
Unaware7013@kbin.social 10 months ago
If you think curating what is allowed on a website is fascism, no one should listen to you at all because you clearly are talking about things you don't understand.
This is the absolute stupidest take I have ever seen. Read a goddamned book (or, actually understand what Nazis stand for) before you comment on things.....
"Censorship and murdering entire classes of people are the same thing"