Nazi Germany.
Comment on Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Good for them. I’m all for allowing people make their own choices about what kind of content they want to see instead of a corporation/government deciding for them.
I can’t think of a single thing we’re succesfully gotten rid of by banning it. I however can think of several examples where it has had an opposite effect.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 year ago
chitak166@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I totally agree.
If I don’t want to see something, I should be able to block it myself.
I don’t want other people deciding what I should and should not see. That’s patronizing.
affiliate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
if the nazis come into power, you will not be able to “decide not to see them”
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I don’t think preemptive fascism is the solution. The world many people seem to be advocating for here doesn’t honestly seem that much different from one led by nazies. They just replace jews and gays with other groups of people they don’t like.
affiliate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
you’re conflating fascism with the actions necessary to stop fascism. you may want to read up on the “paradox of tolerance”. here’s the first sentence from the wikipedia page:
Unaware7013@kbin.social 1 year ago
If you think curating what is allowed on a website is fascism, no one should listen to you at all because you clearly are talking about things you don't understand.
This is the absolute stupidest take I have ever seen. Read a goddamned book (or, actually understand what Nazis stand for) before you comment on things.....
"Censorship and murdering entire classes of people are the same thing"