Comment on Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content

• topinambour_rex@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why couldn’t the man go to a homeless shelter, or a church, or a bus stop, or a park bench, or literally anywhere other than a Nazi’s house? No homeless shelter, church, or a bus stop, park bench wasn’t a possibility, as there was german patrols watching the town. Also, what does a Nazi need a long distance radio for? For hear the news from Germany. Long distance radio was quite popular in the 40s. You could hear radios from the other side of a continent with those. Is that worth a place to sleep for a night? If it prevents you to get arrested by the Nazis, and questioned, I would say yes.

  The man I mention in my post is this guy As he was visiting the french riviera gathering intels for the british intelligence, he got in the situation I described in my previous post.

  source

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Did you bring him up because you believe Hamish MacKenzie is doing some kind of anti-Nazi spy operations nobody else knows about? Because the contexts here are so different that they’re only tangentially related.

    source

    • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Just an example that "If there are 10 nazis at a table… " has plenty of exceptions, like Daryl Davis with kkk members.

      source

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        So do you want the saying to be “if there are 10 Nazis at a table and 1 person who isn’t a Nazi, then there are 11 Nazis at a table, unless the 1 person is actually an anti-Nazi spy, and then it’s okay, and also there are probably other exceptions”? Or do you think maybe that saying was obviously never intended to apply to that the first place?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • FlyingSquid@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The very occasional exception to the saying doesn’t make the saying less applicable in this particular situation.

    source