That doesn’t sound correct. If it were, what would be the point of the block instance feature?
Comment on 41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!!
gregorum@lemm.ee 10 months agoYou can block the instance, but the individual users can still be seen from that instance. You would still have to block each individual user, and that’s ridiculous.
wagoner@infosec.pub 10 months ago
stephen01king@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
It’s to block all posts from that instance, which I think is not enough.
wagoner@infosec.pub 10 months ago
So it blocks all posts from that instance but not all users? What is the difference as I still see none of their users posts, which is the point isn’t it? I’m genuinely not understanding.
stephen01king@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
You can still see their comments, unlike when your instance defederates from their instance. For some people, the ability to completely block all interaction with an instance is important.
gregorum@lemm.ee 10 months ago
exactly. it’s pointless.
alilbee@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If that’s true, that’s definitely something that needs to be addressed. I am all in favor of users having the choice to block instances and their users, and will likely even block Threads myself. This whole shaming campaign against instances though is childish, ineffective, and against the underlying principles of federation. What’s even the point if people are just going to start name and shaming every instance owner making a decision they don’t like?
And for fuck’s sake, I understand the core idea of embrace, extend, extinguish, don’t link me the article (not you, gregorum, just random readers of this comment). I’m just not going to use that as a kneejerk way to shut down any action taken by a company I don’t like.