The “less than” symbol is not limited to whole numbers.
Comment on [deleted]
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 year ago“Fewer” is correct, but it’s wrong to correct “less” to “fewer”. Why? Because language isn’t dictated by an authority, it is negotiated theough billions of interactions every day.
People say “less” to refer to countable objects and nobody is confused by it, so it is valid communication. Just because you had some English teacher mark you down for it in middle school doesn’t mean it’s wrong. You were just miseducated.
Even if we’re talking about strict technical semantics, 5 is less than 7. The < symbol is not called the “fewer than” symbol. “Less” can encompass the concept of “fewer”, so either is fine.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
Does it change its name to “fewer than” when it is used for whole numbers?
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Does it turn into a cucumber if you compare a whole number to an irrational number?
Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
“Let me answer that question with an entirely nonsensical question and also downvote you like a petulant child.”
Useless. I can’t have a conversation with this.
can@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
See: “10 items or less”
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGWiTvYZR_w