Comment on Hackers steal NFTs worth millions. In other news, NFTs worth millions.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months agoAnd what’s your argument?
Comment on Hackers steal NFTs worth millions. In other news, NFTs worth millions.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months agoAnd what’s your argument?
stoy@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
I recomment that you read my earlier comment to read my argument.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
You claim that “governments order companies to do stuff all the time”, but how does that apply to an entry in the blockchain, which we’ve agreed is the authority on who owns property. The hint is: a company couldn’t change an entry in the blockchain, even if the government ordered them to do it.
stoy@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
Why would they change an entry on the blockchain?
To make the dumb idea of tracking peoperties on the blockchain there needs to be admin tools to restore the NFT to the proper owner.
If the NFT gets transfered to someone else illegally, there needs to be tools to add another entry to the chain with a note saying that the NFT was stolen, and this new change restores the ownership to the lawful owner.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
The whole point of the blockchain technologies is that they’re (supposedly) immune to state interference. What’s on the blockchain is the “truth”. The state wouldn’t have any power to restore the proper owner of the NFT / house because they chose to trust blockchain instead of having control over the database.
If states can “restore ownership to the lawful owner”, they can also seize people’s cryptocurrencies.
That’s why no state would ever have house registries on a blockchain that they didn’t control. And if they did control it, there’s no point in using a blockchain when they could just use a traditional database.