I would assume the first to be an ad, because most of depicted people look happy
Comment on Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators
Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 months agoThe ratio of using AI to replace ad art:fraud/plagiarism has to be somewhere around 1:1000.
“Actual productivity” is a nonsense term when it comes to art. Why is this Image less “meaningful” than this? Image
Without checking the source, can you even tell which one is art for an ad and which isn’t?
sukhmel@programming.dev 9 months ago
drmoose@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I’m not sure what’s your point here? Majority of art is drivel. Most art is produced for marketing. Literally. If that can be automated away what are we losing here? McDonald’s logos? Not everything needs to be a career.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 months ago
What a shitty shitty shitty take
drmoose@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Nah. In literally being proven right real time. You can set a reminder or something :)
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Not sure how you can be “right” to generally just shit on the concept of art and think it’s better replaced by ai.