Comment on Spotify doesn't make profit from music streaming, despite having over 400M monthly active users, because it pays two-thirds of all its revenue to the rights holders.

• echo64@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I actually work in cloud engineering and regularly price this kind of thing up.

  Their costs are salaries not aws bills.

  source

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But that’s practically true of any large tech company. It’s been conventional wisdom in the tech industry for over a decade that tech is cheap, people aren’t.

    source

    • echo64@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes. Spotify needs to figure out their burn rate for their salaries because taking more money away from artists isn’t the solution like op wants.

      source

      • cjsolx@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        But taking money away from employees is?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• chameleon@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Not that high. Spotify uses some pretty tight compression (not good, just tight); most users get 96-128kbit/s AAC, premium can go a bit higher if opted in. That works out to about 16KB/s or 58MB/hour, assuming nothing's cached.

  Bandwidth pricing very much goes down with scale, not up. But even the non-committed AWS pricing at Spotify's scale is 2 to 3 cents/GB. You end up paying way less than that with any kind of commitment and AWS isn't the cheapest around to begin with.

  source