I don’t get why they want to defederate without any experience of it either. Let’s see what Meta brings to the table. Maybe they’ll shine a light on the Fediverse and we get a more varied group of people on the platform.
Yeah, and it will end up with huge echochambers full of xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone. Defederation is the last step, not the first. Here, paranoia over what might happen years later down a very slippery slope makes people throw away the opportunity to actually grow the platform instead of leaving it with barely any people at all.
lemmyingly@lemm.ee 6 months ago
ttmrichter@lemmy.world 6 months ago
What Meta has brought to the table in the past. "Maybe we should give them a
secondthirdfourthumpteenth chance!Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Anyone wondering it’s a long winded article blaming meta for a genocide, personally I don’t really see how it fits the conversation beyond ‘zuck bad’ because it’s nothing that’s going to happen here
ttmrichter@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It is an illustration (and a particularly powerful one) of just where Meta’s ethics lie.
You don’t invite serial killers to your Halloween party. You don’t invite Meta to your online community. Same reason in both cases.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 6 months ago
baby its not xenophobic to defederate, calm down
lemmyingly@lemm.ee 6 months ago
No one said such a thing. Where did you get it from?
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Go join a monolithic network if you are not interested in the features of the fediverse.
lemmyingly@lemm.ee 6 months ago
You have yet to show where your statement came from
catchy_name@feddit.it 6 months ago
Do you see the comment from user “Maalus” immediately prior to the comment that you first replied to? That’s where it was said.
If you cannot see that comment it’d be interesting to understand why. Maybe you have blocked that user so can’t see his comment but you are seeing replies to it?