No, that’s not a core concept of Fediverse, that’s exactly the opposite. You want echo chambers? There are plenty of them already. It should be the user who decides what content to see and with which instances to interact, not instance admins.
Imagine Chrome not allowing you to visit specific sites and then Firefox not allowing you to visit a different set of sites. That would be a death of the web.
Maalus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, and it will end up with huge echochambers full of xenophobes scared of everything and defederating everyone. Defederation is the last step, not the first. Here, paranoia over what might happen years later down a very slippery slope makes people throw away the opportunity to actually grow the platform instead of leaving it with barely any people at all.
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 year ago
baby its not xenophobic to defederate, calm down
lemmyingly@lemm.ee 1 year ago
No one said such a thing. Where did you get it from?
abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Go join a monolithic network if you are not interested in the features of the fediverse.
catchy_name@feddit.it 1 year ago
Do you see the comment from user “Maalus” immediately prior to the comment that you first replied to? That’s where it was said.
If you cannot see that comment it’d be interesting to understand why. Maybe you have blocked that user so can’t see his comment but you are seeing replies to it?
lemmyingly@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I don’t get why they want to defederate without any experience of it either. Let’s see what Meta brings to the table. Maybe they’ll shine a light on the Fediverse and we get a more varied group of people on the platform.
ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What Meta has brought to the table in the past. "Maybe we should give them a
secondthirdfourthumpteenth chance!Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Anyone wondering it’s a long winded article blaming meta for a genocide, personally I don’t really see how it fits the conversation beyond ‘zuck bad’ because it’s nothing that’s going to happen here