Comment on Trains were designed to break down after third-party repairs, hackers find
tankplanker@lemmy.world 11 months agoIts not hypothetical, its a widespread issue for aircraft: independent.co.uk/…/airline-scandal-fake-parts-sc…
and did you even read what I wrote?
Dont get me wrong, I want a full right to repair enshrined in law and using a system like this just to prevent it is clearly wrong,
LesserAbe@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I did. The article isn’t about planes.
tankplanker@lemmy.world 11 months ago
The article is about right to repair, third party parts, and systems designed to block both of them, which I applied to an existing problem that applies to planes for certain and almost certainly other forms of public transport. Even a shit idea can be repurposed to improving the common good.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
To be honest, while train safety is extremely important, aircraft safety is a whole ‘nother ballpark. Shit going very wrong on a train is bad, and may kill a lot of people. Shit going very wrong on a plane is catastrophic, and will almost certainly kill everyone on the plane.
Source: I have worked in aerospace
tankplanker@lemmy.world 11 months ago
While parts don’t need to be made to the same standard nor do you need the same depth of safety components, I completely disagree that we should not be applying the same hygiene to part province and maintenance schedules. Obviously this should apply to track side components such as signalling, the track etc. as well, just like it should for the parts of an airport that a plane will interact with.
Avoiding utter maintenance shit shows like the train crash in India that killed 300 people seem just as attractive to fix as they do with planes. Or the toxic spills that America has had that may not have killed as many people but are still expensive and hugely disrupting.
Part of getting maintenance schedules followed properly and using quality parts is right to repair, part availability, and being able to prove part provenance and quality. A method to audit a part is essential for this, if we do whats needed by allowing 3rd parties to make parts to original spec for a reasonable cost, like we should to lower cost. Lower cost, more chance companies will avoid cutting corners, particularly if there is a proper audit trail for the part and you can actually prove that it is the *part *as well.