Can’t really help the small islands and all the shipping traffic and aircraft that have started using it and can benefit from a high speed connection
Comment on US agency will not reinstate $900 mln subsidy for SpaceX Starlink unit
LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 6 months ago
I’m a little torn on this because every time I’ve seen this posted on Lemmy there’re people who praise it and point out how it’s often the only viable option if you’re rural.
However, as someone pointed out, the infrastructure is not really sustainable long term, and may not be very sustainable short term it sounds like either.
We need to bury our electrical anyway, I say start in these rural areas and bury internet right along with it.
AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
Damage@feddit.it 6 months ago
Ships and planes aren’t rural
AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
There are also a lot of rural communities in Alaska, Northern Canada etc where the whole communities only option is satellite internet.
Sure we should get it out to those areas NEAR major cities but there are huge amounts of users where the cost for that would be impractical.
LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 6 months ago
Northern Canada wouldn’t benefit from a US rural internet subsidy.
I’m not familiar with the areas in Alaska you’re referring too but are they completely isolated outside of satellite internet? If they have electric from the grid or cellular telephone service then there are other options using existing infrastructure.
A study from 2019 found national estimates ranged from 180,000 households to 750,000 that are not connected to the electrical grid. That’s out of 131.2 million households in the US. That means adding internet to power line runs as the entire grid infrastructure is updated and buried, which it should be, would mean .006 % of households wouldn’t benefit.
I don’t know what the best solution is but I question the practicality of 100s of millions in subsidies to any private company, not just Starlink.
In my opinion it’s time for internet to become a utility and tie it into the existing infrastructure.
alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 6 months ago
A geosynchronous satellite makes much more sense for those use cases.
Damage@feddit.it 6 months ago
Yeah sure, but ships and planes don’t matter for rural subsidies
badaboomxx@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I agree. Also the issue that I have with starlink is that an any given time, if musk throws a tantrum, you could get kicked out of the internet.