Comment on US agency will not reinstate $900 mln subsidy for SpaceX Starlink unit
jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 11 months ago
Incoming Starlink price increases…
“New and improved” Starlink, with lightning fast speeds upto 8mbps, now from only $1399 per month…
/s
qisope@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Separating Starlink from musk as much as is possible, it’s been a great service for me.
My only other option where I live is 20/1 DSL from CenturyLink, a company which, for me, has been far worse to deal with than Xfinity. The 20/1 service wasn’t even that fast when tested. If one device in the house managed to get a decent download going, the uplink would saturate and prevent pretty much any other traffic.
Starlink meanwhile has been a huge improvement at 120/10 most of the time for me, and very reliable. I pay $120/month.
There’s zero chance any service provider is going to run better corrections out to my neighborhood, the line of sight service options are not in my line of sight, and cell service is a joke.
ReputedlyDeplorable@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I have had a similar experience. Previously the only thing we had was a AT&T hot spot that got 10/2 in one specific window. Starlink has been a godsend allowing me to work from home. My job for the last two years has been remote tech support for manufacturing, where I have to regularly VPN into customers sites to help them get up and running again. With Starlink we get 140/15 average and only occasional drops during severe storms. But yes Musk is not a good person and we would switch to copper or fiber if it was available.
Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Wow 120 dollars a month is a pretty hefty price. Didn’t know that’s what the cost was
Patches@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
You’ll be even more to shocked that it’s often a multi-month wait and you need to pay $600 for the Satellite dish. Not including install.
That said - it’s the best option that a lot of people have ever had. They often can use no internet, old-school satellites which is basically 56kbps, and Starlink.
CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 11 months ago
That’s literally the exact same amount I’m paying Comcast in suburbia. The speed it a little bit better most of the time but it’s not like I can make full use of it.
Candybar121@lemmy.world 11 months ago
ripcord@kbin.social 11 months ago
It's weird. Even in the least densely populated county (and one of the poorest county), we were able to get fiber. 50/25 is pretty reasonably priced, and could go up to 250mbps if we wanted for still fairly reasonable.
If they could do it, don't understand why most places except the most rural western US can't do the same.
Patches@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
As a counter anecdote. I am 15 miles from a town of 150k people and I don’t have fiber, I don’t even have cable.
Thankfully these days we have 4G and Starlink. Otherwise we would have nothing.
InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Just want to say that capitalism is about doing what is most profit able. That does not always mean it has to be the best service or product. This is one such example.