Comment on Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi...

Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• yiliu@informis.land ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There hasn’t been time for that yet. The radio of generated to human content isn’t high enough yet.

  source
• YouSuckLikeLatte@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s not what’s happening

  source
• Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I don’t think the training data has really been updated since its release. This is just them tuning the model, either to save on energy or to filter out undesirable responses.

  source
• ClamDrinker@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  As long as humans are still the driving force behind what content gets spread around (and thus, far more represented in the training data), even if the content is AI generated, it shouldn’t matter. But it’s quite definitely not the case here.

  source
• adam_y@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You might enjoy this short story.

  thestatictravelwriter.co.uk/prime-and-mash

  source