Comment on Mozilla announces their new AI website builder, community reacts appropriately

• DarkThoughts@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Those are stupid and I doubt any web developer wrote these. Unless they were also scared about WYSIWYG editors 25+ years ago.

  source

  • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You don't have to spam me by deleting and lazily reposting your comment.

      source
  • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Unless they were also scared about WYSIWYG editors 25+ years ago.

      I guess even web developers can be stupid. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      source
  • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Not to be finicky, but neither of these necessarily indicate “development” experience.

      Admin and server host

      SysAdmin & Owner of Mastodon instance

      source

      • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        [deleted]

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Patch@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  1. “The steam loom is going to put weavers out of work, industrialization is a double edged sword and needs to be carefully considered”.

  2. This is the same complaint made about literally every single AI programme. It’s not necessarily invalid, but if Mozilla doesn’t move into this space plenty of other competitors still will.

  3. Mozilla is allowed to do more than one thing.

  source

  • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • Patch@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Why do you keep deleting your messages and re-replying with essentially the same thing?

      I’ll repost my reply to your last deleted message:

      As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.

      If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.

      source
  • LWD@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • Patch@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As someone who has never had any particular compunction about sailing the digital seven seas, and generally has a liberal view of copyright laws and overly comprehensive intellectual property protections, I really don’t give a hoot about whether publicly accessible websites have been used as training data for a website creating system.

      If you don’t want people/machines to read your intellectual property, don’t post it on the internet.

      source