Comment on [META] Are paid for closer source advertising appropriate?
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 1 day ago
I don’t need any proprietary servers. So I’d vote for dropping the non-free projects. Except maybe Unraid and Plex maybe. I feel that’s (become) part of selfhosting.
And I think all the new accounts advertising Slop-projects are massively annoying. I’d rather talk about other stuff and send them someplace else.
I’m ambivalent about the topic because the goal is for us to own our servers…
Most of the hardware I use is proprietary, but at the end of the day Intel can’t come and rob me of the object I paid for. Sure it will become obsolete in 10 or 20 years, but I’m still the owner.
When it comes to software, I want to own it, not just a license. Most proprietary software comes with strings attached, which is why I don’t think it fits the self-hosting philosophy.
If a proprietary software was “buy it once and own the binaries forever”, I wouldn’t mind seeing it discussed here. (Plex with lifetime licenses comes to mind.)
However, I don’t want to see advertisement for a proprietary software the same way I don’t want to see ads for some specific hardware components.
That’s my opinion.