Comment on Starlink loses out on $886 million in rural broadband subsidies
circuscritic@lemmy.ca 11 months agoStarlink is a defense contractor, ITAR was bullshit reasoning and not at all applicable. That’s like saying Raytheon missiles can’t be used to attack foreign targets, because ITAR, or even more accurately, Ukrainian missiles with American copper can’t be used.
But that guys comments about “the generals bought a minor stake the next day” is also just as full of shit.
SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 months ago
The fuck are you talking about starlink is not a defense contractor… it’s like saying Microsoft is a defense contractor because the military uses windows…ITAR was absolutely in play here…
circuscritic@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
SpaceX and Starlink are both defense contractors.
Microsoft is also a Defense contractor…
SupraMario@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Starlink was not sold or provided to Ukraine under a defense contract… defense contractors who are labeled as such do not typically work with the public directly. You’re definition of a defense contractor apparently is any company who has worked on a DOJ or DOD bid…which means basically all companies in the USA. This doesn’t magically make them not have to follow civilian regulations. ITAR is in play here, just because starlink has defense contracts, doesn’t magically give them a pass on other regulations.
Cereal companies get defense contracts FFS…that doesn’t make them a defense contractor.
circuscritic@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
Why would working a DOJ bid make a company a defense contractor…?
JFC…you might actually need a reeducation camp, but instead of propaganda, it’s just a forced repeat of K-12 education. You can finally earn a HS diploma.