Comment on [META] Are paid for closer source advertising appropriate?
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 weeks agoPersonally? I have zero interest in that happening. As I’ve said before, I consider myself the janitor not the dictator.
It would be selfhosting related, of primary relevance as a lot of folks use it still despite…. everything plex has done in the past several years, and I would not be able to consider it a rule violation as of now.
There would need to be a new rule or a change to the existing.
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Right …
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 weeks ago
So lets get specific on rules, and break it down and turn your post into one:
Now what about mostly open but with a paywall on features (so partially closed)?
I’m happy to have a rule change here, I just think it needs to be a clear rule and community supported. If you’d like I can make it a pinned post to be voted/commented on.
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I think the wording is reasonable. appreciate the effort!
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 weeks ago
I tweaked things a bit to be more about percentage of comments/posts, which I think may be a better approach, in a newly posted sticky so we can memorialize the change. Its not implemented yet, and we can go back to an age-of-account approach, but I think % participation may make more sense.