Comment

Comment on Sainsbury’s boss defends decision to sell customers’ Nectar card data

mannycalavera@feddit.uk ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

That’s no fun for the guardian. Gotta get those clicks with controversial misleading headlines. Totally not a tabloid, totally…

What this article fails to explain is what exactly they are selling and how that is matched up to groups of users. It also fails to explain how advertising is linked to anonymous users at the other end and how throughout all of this it’s just a random ID they are targeting rather than Mr Phillips from Doncaster. It doesn’t explain at all the mechanism to do this because it doesn’t match the narrative they want to push of outrage.

Never stop being the guardian, never stop. 😂🤣😂.

source

Sort:hotnew top

HeartyBeast@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It looks like the Guardian is basing this off reports from Dispatches and The Times and iy seems that it's really mot quite clear how it works. Here's the de-paywalled Times report: https://archive.is/s5eDe

... a “clean room” can match specific shoppers, or small groups of shoppers, with specific television viewers and work out when they are likely to be the same person.

Few experts are willing to reveal the exact science, but the software can make a remarkably accurate match. This is because supermarket shoppers reveal so much about their income, lifestyle, location and family set-up from what they put in their baskets — and because television viewers expose so much about their habits, income and location from what they watch.

For example, the experts will know when someone has stopped watching I’m a Celebrity, but still watches Coronation Street, and where they log on to watch it. “With data matching, they tend to use ‘lookalike data’ — this person [on a supermarket database] looks very much like the same person [on a broadcaster’s database],” explains Duff.

They can also add in third party databases, such as Facebook, and the matching is uncannily accurate, as well as being privacy compliant, according to experts.

source
Primarily0617@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
you can't "anonymize" data

ask the people outed as lgbt by netflix's anonymized data set

source
- mannycalavera@feddit.uk ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  You absolutely can anonymise data.
  
  However it’s also true that of you don’t do it correctly users can be identified. Sounds like Netflix didn’t do it properly. I don’t know, do you have a link I could look at?
  
  source
  - Primarily0617@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    anonymising data is a treadmill problem
    
    what might work now won't hold up to the de-anonymising techniques of a few years from now
    
    so no, you can't really
    
    source
    mannycalavera@feddit.uk ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Create anonymous UUID, store interactions against this in a separate table, ensure PII is removed prior to storing. So instead of Max Reboo has purchased a subscription to jugs and hooters it’s user 12345678901234576 has purchased jugs and hooters. How can a future treadmill de-anonymise this? For sure if the storage is done badly then you can track back to a particular user.
    
    Also, once again, can you link to the netflix issue you quoted above please. Thanks.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments