Comment

Comment on Google admits it's making YouTube worse for ad block users

Illegal to do…what? Not offer high-res videos? To have any delay before streaming videos? To refuse to serve you videos, even if doing so caused them to lose money? How would you enforce that on Google, much less on smaller startups? Would it apply to PeerTube instances?

Google sucks for doing this. It’ll drive people to competitors–hopefully even federated competitors. But laws to ‘fix’ the problem would be nearly impossible to craft–and would be counterproductive in the long term, because they’d cement the status quo. Let Google suck, so that people switch away from it.

source

Sort:hotnew top

TrickDacy@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Discriminate against browsers.

And I did write that it would be too hard to enforce. I’m a software developer so I understand that it’s more complicated than it sounds.

source
- QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I agree with the spirit of what you’re saying, but they aren’t really discriminating against browsers at all. As far as I understand it, they pretty much have an
  
  if (!adPageElement.isLoaded) { showStupidPopup(); }
  
  in there somewhere. It doesn’t rely on any nefarious browser implementation-specific extensions; everyone gets that same code and runs it. As for the 5 seconds thing, IIRC some FF configurations were triggering false positives, but I think it was patched. It does seem awfully convenient, and maybe they only patched it because they got caught, but they also must have been morons to think something that obvious wouldn’t be noticed immediately.
  
  source
- yiliu@informis.land ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I think they claimed they’re not discriminating against browsers, they’re just better at identifying adblockers on Firefox or something.
  
  source