Vanguard, BattlEye, EasyAntiCheat, Ricochet, etc… all run in the Windows Kernel and have most have the functionality to run arbitrary code, so might as well class them as rootkits.
Comment on Windows 11 scores dead last in gaming performance tests against 3 Linux gaming distros
Toribor@corndog.social 1 year agoWhen did ‘rootkit’ come to be a generic term for invasive software? Rootkits are a specific type of thing.
agraves@lm.possum.city 1 year ago
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Because “rootkit” sounds more ominous and scary than “kernel level anticheat” and the communities complaining about such things aren’t known to keep hyperbole to a minimum. Gotta push that FUD.
This article for instance, using language that insinuates a huge gap in performance between the Linux distros and windows, when it’s a 6% difference between the best and the worst, on one set of hardware.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If it has kernel level access and can run arbitrary code, that’s a rootkit.
It’s absolutely valid to call these systems rootkits.
lemann@lemmy.one 1 year ago
Anticheats that run in the NT kernel may as well be described as rootkits, especially as they aren’t transparent about exactly what they’re doing. Then there’s the question of what happens if they get compromised