Comment on Is jQuery still the go-to JS helper library?
kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 months agonah mate,mixing html into js is fucked, no matter how hard you cope.
Comment on Is jQuery still the go-to JS helper library?
kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 months agonah mate,mixing html into js is fucked, no matter how hard you cope.
realharo@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Still better than whatever the hell this is
vuejs.org/guide/essentials/template-syntax
The more you scroll down, the worse it gets.
And this too: vuejs.org/guide/essentials/list
kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 months ago
template syntax is a piece of cake, takes literally 2 hours to learn everything you need and you can easily see what’s where and how the html will look when it’s rendered or not.
realharo@lemm.ee 11 months ago
But why bother with creating a new language, and duplicating all the features your language already has, in a weird way?
If I want a list of items based on an array, I can just do
items.map(item => )
, using the normalmap
function that’s already part of the language.Or I can use a function, e.g.
items.map(item => renderItem(item, otherData))
etc.spartanatreyu@programming.dev 11 months ago
I don’t think this is a very good example. You’ve just said not to use a new language, then used JSX, a new language.
kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 months ago
but how do you know what renderItem does? where will the items end up?
we are visual creatures.
if I see a <ul><li></li></ul> I know it’s doing a list item for every object in given list.
it’s literally just html with a few added stuff, v-if to determine whether it’s rendered, v-for for iteration, dynamic class bindings and event listener bindings.