Can you expand on why you think they are that? I'm dumb and not understanding.
"prohibit website operators from banning users or removing speech and content based on the viewpoints and opinions of the users in question"
That sounds like subjective and obviously biased opinions, which obviously should be removed?
I'd really like to understand why you think Wikipedia should fuck off. It might be subpar, but there still exist dictionaries, journalism and a lot of other places on the internet than Wikipedia.
As I recall, Wikipedia is not an accepted source in academia, but it's fantastic for everyday use.
ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 9 months ago
They’re not.
Also, fuck you.