It was usually old-style (insecure) and expensive, covered with hidden funding, or new tech (somewhat secure) and even more expensive.
Comment on China starts up world's first fourth-generation nuclear reactor
qooqie@lemmy.world 1 year agoHave others been uneconomical?
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 year ago
viking@infosec.pub 1 year ago
Not at all, but long term storage of exhausted nuclear rods still costs an unknown amount of money endless centuries into the future. So you can’t really put a number on the final bill.
realitista@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Some types of reactors can also use those waste products as fuel and in turn make them into other waste products that only last a couple hundred years, so it’s not a easy calculation to make unless you know what’s deployed in the future.
TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Eh we’ll just dump em into the Sun someday if we start running out of space here on earth.
viking@infosec.pub 1 year ago
That has been suggested for decades, problem is that if any of the transporters blow up on their way to space, you essentially have a dirty bomb covering covering half the planet. No bueno.