Comment on Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"

• gapbetweenus@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Sure buddy what ever makes you happy.

  source

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    None of this makes me happy

    source

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That’s strange, ignorance is supposed to be bliss.

      source
    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Sorry to hear.

      source
• TootGuitar@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You say “ask the dictionary” — multiple dictionary definitions as well as Wikipedia say that theft requires the intent to deprive the original owner of the property in question, which obviously doesn’t apply to copyright infringement of digital works

  You say “ask the law” — copyright infringement is not stealing, they are literally two completely different statutes, at least in the US.

  So, what the hell are you talking about? Copyright infringement is not theft.

  source

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    multiple dictionary definitions as well as Wikipedia say that theft requires the intent to deprive the original owner of the property in question

    Like many words, “theft” has several different definitions, that being one of them.

    copyright infringement is not stealing

    Congratulations, that’s the 4th strawman in this thread. No one is talking about copyrights.

    So what the hell are you talking about?

    source

    • TootGuitar@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My brother/sister in Christ, everyone in this discussion is talking about copyright infringement. That is the actual legal name for what we colloquially refer to as “piracy,” according to, you know, the law, which you previously referenced as something we should look to.

      source