Yes, yes, you’re quite right. Things must be accessible to 2 year olds, or they’re not worth doing. Or if they’re not accessible to someone, they should have no direct means to understand them.
Now carry on believing all of that, if that’s what you wish.
XbSuper@lemmy.world 9 months ago
If it needs explanation, it’s not a good joke.
stebo02@sopuli.xyz 9 months ago
that’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard
SciPiTie@iusearchlinux.fyi 9 months ago
You are one of today’s lucky 10.000! www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/…/1053:_Ten_Thousand
JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Saying ‘what kind of an idiot doesn’t know about the Yellowstone supervolcano’ is so much more boring than telling someone about the Yellowstone supervolcano for the first time.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Are you kidding? Half the fun of Randall’s comics is learning something new from them!
celeste@kbin.social 9 months ago
That assumes every human being has the same base of knowledge and people have to cater to that to tell a good joke. You can just not like it.
Kichae@lemmy.ca 9 months ago
Yes, yes, you’re quite right. Things must be accessible to 2 year olds, or they’re not worth doing. Or if they’re not accessible to someone, they should have no direct means to understand them.
Now carry on believing all of that, if that’s what you wish.