you can easily tell an LLM to sprinkle a couple typos or spelling mistakes into a text
The sad thing is that it almost certainly isn’t. The spelling mistakes that were made aren’t characteristic of AI generated blurbs which means they paid someone to write this lol.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Are you suggesting someone instructed an AI to write an article with typos? Wtf purpose would that serve?
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
To get exactly this reaction “can’t be ai, it has typos”
Tattorack@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Occam’s razor says no to that.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Underpaid tech bloggers playing 4d chess
FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Write the article in the style of a junior high student” probably gets close enough to be believable, who needs an editor!
Aatube@kbin.social 11 months ago
There’s no point in doing that
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Yes there is. It clearly creates doubt as to whether it was generated. As exemplified by the discussion you’re commenting to. Bold to come on and just … say something already demonstrated as wrong…
BudgieMania@kbin.social 11 months ago
Yeah this type of "thing in Reddit happens..." articles have been going on for a long time, ever since it took off. It's what drove me off traditional media and into reddit in the first place, so many articles where "Redditor does this" "Redditor discovers that" that I eventually was like fuck it why wouldn't I just go to the source of all of this lol