Comment on Researcher has developed, at a cost of less than one dollar, a wireless light switch that runs without batteries, can be installed anywhere on a wall and could reduce the cost of wiring a house by ...

asbestos@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• kae@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  ?

  Wireless switches — consisting of a transmitter on the switch and a receiver near a light fixture or other appliance — have been around for many years, and have been proven that they can reduce the material and labour cost for wiring houses, says Kambiz Moez, director of electrical engineering in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, but they require batteries to operate.

  So the product already exists, what is novel here is a concept to harvest RF energy I stead of batteries.

  source

  • orclev@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I think this is the usual thing where some engineer/scientist has developed a product that’s interesting and put out a press release then a journalist got ahold of it, grossly misinterpreted what was being said and wrote an article speculating that this would lead to all kinds of things that are not even remotely possible.

    The article claims this will somehow save money on wiring a house, but that emphatically does not seem to be the case, that’s not the problem being solved here. This isn’t a revolutionary breakthrough, this is just a slightly interesting design to power IoT devices via wireless power rather than the usual dime batteries.

    source
  • venusenvy47@reddthat.com ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I wouldn’t call it “harvesting” if you have operate power transmitters on each floor of the house. “Energy harvesting” usually means you are using something that is already present in the environment.

    “each floor would have one or two RF (radio frequency) power transmitters to powe r up all switches inside the house.”

    source
  • Nighed@sffa.community ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I imagine replacing the battery in your light switch in the dark (because you can’t turn the lights on) is probably rather annoying. This sounds like a cool idea.

    source

    • realharo@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Replacing the battery in your light switch is something you do maybe once every 3 years.

      And you can still use your phone as a backup remote. Or just switch the whole thing off/on at the hard-wired wall switch manually.

      source
• RaoulDook@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Seems like a solution to add light switches for people who have homes that weren’t wired properly with switches for their lights.

  For those of us with proper wiring, this probably falls under “ain’t broke, don’t fix it”

  source

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Or folks like me who have an all cinderblock exterior.

    source
  • PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Living in a 150 year old house without proper wiring, this would be an immense improvement.

    source
• kozy138@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Copper wires are expensive. And you need to house those wires in aluminum pipes. That’s a lot of metal that you no longer need to buy. Especially considering how many light switches in our homes.

  source