I dont get it either. The only explanation to this is that they had humans create spotify wrapped
Comment on Spotify axes 17% of workforce in third round of layoffs this year
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
Something that I don’t quite understand about Spotify is why they had the amount of employees that they did in the first place. What were 9000 people doing for work on a music playing and recommendation website. I know they used to be highly innovative and disruptive a long time ago, but has that been the case in recent years? How were 9k people contributing to this already established web music app?
redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
scytale@lemm.ee 6 months ago
I don’t know how many in that 9000 are actual developers, but you also have to take into account the non-technical corporate employees (accounting, legal, marketing, support, curators, HR, etc.). They also have offices in different countries that most likely have some sort of corporate structure (all of the above roles, just on a smaller scale).
Glowstick@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Even if only half of those employees were working on the actual product and product-adjacent roles, it still seems hard to come up with 4500 jobs. In fact I think the number of employees might be what led to a bunch of their missteps over the past many years. Like the multiple interface redesigns that no one asked for and actively disliked.
Knusper@feddit.de 6 months ago
Yeah, I could imagine their legal department actually making up a sizeable chunk, with how much the music industry loves to sue.
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
Let’s imagine we have massive departments for each one of those, like 300 people average for each of your example areas. For me it’s insane just thinking about it considering what the product actually is. I’m still left with 7200 people unaccounted for.