There is nothing in the article to suggest that the TSA programs’ errors have inconvenienced people as the agent is right there to correct it, and more scans improves the accuracy. I get what you’re saying, but the same biases are undoubtedly programmed into the brains of the agents and just as hard to eradicate.
There are many places I don’t want to see facial recognition employed, but where people are already mandated to positively identify themselves seems like a natural fit. I think the senators and the ACLU can find much more persuasive examples of overreach.
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You’re free to offer up being tracked and monitored everywhere you go, but I’m not okay with that.
paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
My point is the bill would be more interesting if it was not restricted to the TSA in an airport, but maybe they have to start somewhere?