Comment

Comment on Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Yes, but, as you noted in an earlier post, that isn’t what you’re responding to.

I keep saying what I’m responding to, but you’re trying to change the narrative of what I’m responding, to as a debate tactic.

Someone uses a debate tactic of mentioning an “one off” and then directing their whole conversation to that one singular point is not intellectually honest in the whole conversation being had.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Odiousmachine@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Image

source
- CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Looking for your point of flesh now too, eh? Lemmy is a really great place to have conversations w/o toxicity or gang-gatekeeping.
  
  source
  - Odiousmachine@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    It’s interesting to see how you as the only person repeatedly seem to be missing the point. And instead of admitting that you made a mistake you dig deeper and deeper.
    
    source
    CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    It’s interesting to see how you as the only person repeatedly seem to be missing the point. And instead of admitting that you made a mistake you dig deeper and deeper.
    
    Repeating your point, because its being misrepresented, is not digging deeper, its attempting to correct the record.
    
    At this point its painfully obvious that we’re not going to agree, so how about we just agree to disagree, and move on?
    
    source
WoahWoah@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
[deleted]
source
- CosmicCleric@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Well, having been in the business, there are signs, “tells”.
  
  But, you do you too, as well.
  
  source