Comment on Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police
WoahWoah@lemmy.world 10 months agoYes, but, as you noted in an earlier post, that isn’t what you’re responding to. The point of the post you stated you are responding to is that if an event occurs that leaves no change to the context from before and after the occurrence, then binary search is ineffective.
The fact that you’re wasting this much time trying to defend such a simple error is confusing. The reasonable response is, “oh, yes, in that particular case, binary search is ineffective.”
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I keep saying what I’m responding to, but you’re trying to change the narrative of what I’m responding, to as a debate tactic.
Someone uses a debate tactic of mentioning an “one off” and then directing their whole conversation to that one singular point is not intellectually honest in the whole conversation being had.
Odiousmachine@feddit.de 10 months ago
Image
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Looking for your point of flesh now too, eh? Lemmy is a really great place to have conversations w/o toxicity or gang-gatekeeping.
Odiousmachine@feddit.de 10 months ago
It’s interesting to see how you as the only person repeatedly seem to be missing the point. And instead of admitting that you made a mistake you dig deeper and deeper.
WoahWoah@lemmy.world 10 months ago
CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Well, having been in the business, there are signs, “tells”.
But, you do you too, as well.