I dunno. “Don’t attribute to malice what can be sufficiently explained by stupidity.” I can totally believe that the average police officer has not thought this through. “5 hours of footage! We don’t have 5 hours to look for one bike.”
Comment on Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police
rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 year agoThey probably do know. They just aren’t meant for protecting your personal property
SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 1 year ago
“Don’t attribute to malice that which can be sufficiently explained by stupidity.”
Attachment: media.kbin.social ↗
Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
And Detective Conan Doyle O’Brien really did just let his bro fuck around and watch porn and even bring a stripper into the station during footage reviewing hours. Of course, Stuart was quite shocked to hear he was not invited to the stag do later that weekend
tiramichu@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Right.
What they really want to say is “We aren’t interested in investigating your personal theft. Things get stolen all the time and we really can’t be bothered. You are not important to us.”
But they can’t say that, so they instead come up with some excuse that puts the onus back on the other person.
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 year ago
You dont quite understand.
They aren’t here to protect your property.
Or you, really.
Not unless you have a couple million in assets, then all of a sudden it’s all hands on deck, let’s get this bicycle back.
Vant@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I’m sorry about your head injury.
Rediphile@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
They can, and do, say that.