Comment on no title posted
mathias@friendica.hellquist.eu 1 year agoIn general I find it noteworthy that pretty much no one is talking about the phenomenal growth Akkoma has had since its launch, which was just over 1 year ago. Comparatively it is really impressive.
It is twice the size a certain other service that "everyone" talks about (and the same amount of MAU's, which admittedly speaks for the even newer service), and which I also wish well, but given the talk about it I would've expected it to be explosive...not half the amount of users of Akkoma.
I just find it noteworthy that there isn't a beep regarding Akkoma (unless it comes from me, and people are bored of me raving about it).
I wonder what would've happened if Akkoma had gotten the same exposure though, given that it has a similar feature set.
marcelcosta@bcn.fedi.cat 1 year ago
I appreciate the need to make visible many software. This is part of the decentralization! I can do a second round of analysis looking at these. However, in this first part I focused in the user distribution between servers. I did a first analyisis including the software information (I have shared it, although is not in english), but will be interesting to see the dynamics, too!
I have to say that I did this analysis in my free time, so I am sure that many things can be improved!
mathias@friendica.hellquist.eu 1 year ago
@marcelcosta @fediversenews Oh yeah, sorry, I just read the comment from @jupiter_rowland and felt I needed to air this thought I've had for a while, I forgot his reply was in relation to this visualisation.
I find your analysis really interesting. I didn't mean to give critique to that. I was just doing a fly-by comment of a general observation.
marcelcosta@bcn.fedi.cat 1 year ago